When considering the implementation of various testing methodologies for testing a person’s blood alcohol content (BAC), a number of Human Resource directors in various organization and companies need information about alcohol blood tests vs breathalyzers.
A blood alcohol test (also known as an alcohol blood test and a blood test for alcohol) directly measures BAC and is the most accurate method for testing a person’s blood alcohol content.
A breath alcohol test, such as a breathalyzer test, conversely, estimates blood alcohol concentration or content indirectly by measuring the amount of alcohol in a person’s breath.
Breathalyzers Estimate A Person’s Blood Alcohol Content
A breathalyzer is a device that is used for estimating a person’s blood alcohol content (BAC) froma breath sample.
In the United States, the Alcosensor, Datamaster, Alcotest Intoxilyzer, and the Intoximeter are the most common breathalyzer brand names currently in use.
Breathalyzers can detect and measure current alcohol levels. The person blows into a breathalyzer and the results are given as a number, known as the Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) which shows the level of alcohol in the blood at the time the test was taken.
Since 2002, it has been illegal in all 50 U.S. states to drive with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) that is .08% or higher.
Breathalyzers do not directly measure blood alcohol concentration or content. Measuring blood alcohol content (BAC) requires the analysis of a blood sample.
Breathalyzers, rather, estimate blood alcohol concentration or content indirectly by measuring the amount of alcohol in one’s breath.
Key Issues With Breathalyzers
A major issue with some breathalyzers is that they not only detect the ethyl alcohol found in alcohol beverages, but also in other substances that have a similar molecular structure.
Stated differently, the “problem” breathalyzers identify any compound containing the methyl group molecular structure.
And the issue with this is that more than one hundred compounds can be found in a human’s breath at any one time and 70% to 80% of these compounds contain the methyl group molecular structure.
The consequence of this is that these methyl group molecular structures will be incorrectly identified and labeled as ethyl alcohol.
Interestingly, the more ethyl group substances the breathalyzer detects, the higher the false blood alcohol content estimate will be.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has found that people who are diabetics or dieters can have acetone levels that are hundreds, if not a thousand of times higher than people who are not diabetics or dieters. The key issue here is that acetone is one of the many substances that can be falsely detected as ethyl alcohol by some breathalyzers.
There’s also a variety of products found in the environment that can lead to erroneous BAC results with breathalyzers. Some these products include substances or compounds found in cleaning fluids, celluloid, gasoline, paint removers, and in lacquers.
Other common substances that can result in false BAC levels are alcohol, vomit, or blood in the person’s mouth. False BAC readings can also be caused from electrical interference, dirt, smoke, cell phones, police radios, moisture, and tobacco smoke.
Breathalyzers can be very sensitive to temperature and will result in false readings if they are not adjusted or re-calibrated to compensate for ambient or surrounding air temperatures. Moreover, the temperature of the person being tested is also significant.
More specifically, each degree (in Fahrenheit) in the subject’s body temperature above 98.6 can result in a relatively large elevation (about 8%) in apparent BAC.
A person’s breathing rate can also significantly affect breathalyzer results. For instance, one study discovered that the BAC readings of people who ran up a flight of stairs decreased 11% to 14%.
And when these people ran up the stairs a second time, their BAC readings decreased 22% to 25%. Another study found similar results (a decrease in BAC of 15%) in people who exercised vigorously or who hyperventilated.
Moreover, hyperventilation for just 20 seconds has been shown to lower the breathalyzer BAC readings by about 10%. Conversely, people who hold their breath for 30 seconds can increase the breathalyzer BAC results by approximately 15%.
The failure of law enforcement officers to use the breathalyzers properly and to properly maintain and re-calibrate the units when necessary also lead to testing errors.
Research indicates that breath tests can vary at least 15% from actual blood alcohol concentration. An estimated 23% of individuals tested will have a BAC reading higher than their true BAC.
Can Breathalyzers be Fooled by Odors?
A common myth is that breathalyzers can be “fooled” by odors that mask the smell of alcohol. Mints, onions, and mouthwash may indeed disguise the smell of alcohol, but they do not fool the breathalyzer because they do not change the actual alcohol content on a person’s breath.
What can “fool” breathalyzers, however, are products such as breath spray or mouthwash that can raise the BAC readings due to the alcohol content in these products.
Listerine, for example, contains 27% alcohol, and can significantly raise the BAC test results. Why? Due to the increased alcohol (from the Listerine) detected on the person’s breath, the breathalyzer produces a false high reading.
Stated differently, instead of the reading being based on alcohol in the blood that has been diffused into the lungs, the breathalyzer will result in a false reading due to the combined alcohol in the person’s mouth (from the Listerine) and from the person’s lungs.
Blood Tests
A blood test for alcohol (also called a blood alcohol test and an alcohol blood test) is the most accurate method for testing a person’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC).
Blood alcohol tests, moreover, are the most expensive and the most intrusive methods for testing BAC. Due mainly to their high cost and to their intrusiveness, however, alcohol blood tests comprise the least common method for testing a person’s BAC.
Alcohol Blood Tests vs. Breathalyzers: Conclusion
An alcohol blood test (also called a blood alcohol test or a blood test for alcohol) directly measures a person’s blood alcohol content and is the most accurate method for testing a person’s blood alcohol level.
A breath alcohol test, such as a breathalyzer test, on the other hand, estimates the blood alcohol concentration or content indirectly by measuring the amount of alcohol in an individual’s breath.
According to current demographic statistics, alcohol abuse accounts for approximately two-thirds of the total number of substance abuse complaints in US workplaces. In addition, the use or abuse of alcohol is associated with nearly half of all industrial accidents.
As a consequence, there is a growing demand for more reliable alcohol detection and testing methods. Indeed, an increasing number of companies are employing alcoholism screening tests and random alcohol testing as part of their employee drug and alcohol testing programs.
In a word, more and more Human Resources directors in different organizations and companies are seeking more detailed information about alcohol blood tests vs breathalyzers so that they can purchase and implement cost-effective and reliable methods of employee alcohol testing.
|
The following toll-free phone number is a number to a call center/treatment center that we are proudly affiliated with. This treatment facility provides top-quality and professional “holistic” drug and alcohol rehab and counseling that addresses virtually every aspect of the person’s life. There is someone at this phone number 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Please call this number if you have questions about a drug or alcohol problem or if you want some information about top-of-the-line drug or alcohol treatment. (888) 565-2282 |
____________________________________________________
If the results from breathalyzers are so questionable and possibly inaccurate, why do the police use them so often? Maybe administering a blood alcohol test is out of the question for most field sobriety test situations, but what about using hair tests or urine tests? Or better yet, why not improve upon the accuracy of breathalyzer tests?
I realize that breathalyzer tests are less invasive, but if employers want to get the most accurate test results why don’t more of them use alcohol blood tests?
If breathalyzer tests are so unreliable, either stop using them or significantly upgrade their accuracy and reliability.
With all the capabilities employers and the police have for test people for drugs and alcohol, why do people continue to “push the limit” and either go to work under the influence of alcohol or drugs or drive after they have taken drugs or drank some alcohol?
With all the drug and alcohol abuse in our society, I wonder if churches will ever test for drugs and alcohol.
I have often wondered why the police don’t use alcohol blood tests rather than breathalyzers. Sure breathalyzer tests are less invasive and easier to administer, but they are alcohol less accurate than blood alcohol tests.
I’ve been that while alcohol blood tests are the most accurate way to test for alcohol, with the new methods of testing for alcohol via hair tests, maybe employers will start using more hair tests rather than urine alcohol tests.
I realize that employers don’t usually use blood alcohol tests or breathalyzers in their alcohol testing programs and instead use urine alcohol tests. If blood alcohol tests are more accurate, why not use them?
Is the issue really about alcohol blood tests and breathalyzer tests or is it more about the different alcohol testing options that are available to schools, companies, and institutions? Sadly, it seems that almost any reason whatsoever is justification for alcohol abuse in our society. Indeed, when people get promoted they often go out and celebrate by drinking. When people are sad and depressed, they often go and get intoxicated. When people get a divorce they often drown their sorrows in alcohol. When women are going to have a baby, many of them celebrate by drinking. The point: people drink for just about any reason and the more they do this, the more likely it is that they will engage in abusive drinking.
I enjoyed reading your article about “Alcohol Blood Tests vs. Breathalyzers.” Without a doubt, I would rather take a breathalyzers test or a urine test before a blood alcohol test.
If blood alcohol tests are too invasive, and breathalyzer tests are so unreliable, why don’t police officers use hair tests when they do field sobriety tests? I wonder if it takes too long to get the results from hair tests.